Jump to content
patrick reif

Chatterbait Blades?

Recommended Posts

I think this may be a bit ridiculous to ask, but I'd like to know.

 With spinnerbait blades there is a huge difference in quality by the manufacturer.  Is this also true with chatterbait blades.  I have only seen a few options available and want to buy the best that I can.

Also, instead of using an Arkie jig head, is there any reason I can't just use my snootie nose jig instead?  They both use the 60 degree hook, so I'd think they would swim about the same.  The snootie is actually a better swimmer from what I've seen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't found a big difference with chatterbait blades but as you said, there aren't many options. As for the Snootie, I've made a lot of chatterbaits with that head and I love it, I've made them with double split rings and I've made them with the blade attached to the hook by opening up the hook eye and both work well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can use any jig you wish.

 

Right now it seems there's only one company stamping blades.  I have a good feeling that this is about to change.

 

Best way to assemble them is to use a flat eye hook and a single connector.  My buddy in the tackle business is going through about 400-500 baits a week and has the assembly down to a science.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep... there is currently only one company stamping chatter blades for making your own baits.

I have actually started using a spinner bait mold for making chatter baits.  I use a straight wire shaft and then trim it so I can make the snap bend that smalljaw makes on his spinner baits.  Then I just snap on the chatter blade.  I prefer the Do It Ultra Minnow mold.

Here is a link to his

.  smalljaw makes it look easy but the first ones I bent came out looking like crap.

JB

Edited by JBarlow
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe Cast Ind. stamps the rounded chatter blades.  It used to be Battlefield Wire which was a few miles from my house until they retired/sold off.  I'm not sure if Cast Ind. stamps the Z man coffin shaped blades.  I haven't seen them for sale to us common folk.

Edited by EironBreaker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe Cast Ind. stamps the rounded chatter blades.  It used to be Battlefield Wire which was a few miles from my house until they retired/sold off.  I'm not sure if Cast Ind. stamps the Z man coffin shaped blades.  I haven't seen them for sale to us common folk.

 

 

You can't buy the coffin shaped ones because one of Z-Mans patents covers the coffin shape of the blade.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem I have with the blades that most tackle supply websites carry is that the metal is way too thick.  The original RAD chatterbait used a blade that is about half the thickness of the blades you can buy from tackle making suppliers.  The only option might be to order some thin stainless stock and cut the blades out using tin snips and drilling the holes with a dremel and a tiny bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem I have with the blades that most tackle supply websites carry is that the metal is way too thick.  The original RAD chatterbait used a blade that is about half the thickness of the blades you can buy from tackle making suppliers.  The only option might be to order some thin stainless stock and cut the blades out using tin snips and drilling the holes with a dremel and a tiny bit.

 

Jeff,

   When you say too thick are you referring to the current blades that are sold? Not  the coffin blades. Reason I'm asking is that depending on the demand of the thinner ones,they can be made with thinner stainless steel. Is there any patents on the ones everyone is currently selling? If not I am going to look into this. I just bought some blades from LPO and I believe every distributor is buying them from the same manufacturer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeff,

   When you say too thick are you referring to the current blades that are sold? Not  the coffin blades. Reason I'm asking is that depending on the demand of the thinner ones,they can be made with thinner stainless steel. Is there any patents on the ones everyone is currently selling? If not I am going to look into this. I just bought some blades from LPO and I believe every distributor is buying them from the same manufacturer.

Yes, I was referring to the blades that are currently sold through LPO, Jann's, and Barlow's.  Those blades measure .20" on my micrometer, while the original RAD blades measure .11".  I'm no engineer or physicist, so please correct any misinterpretations.  While two identically shaped blades would likely have the same hydrodynamic effect on the bait, I wonder if the thinner (and therefore lighter) blades balance with the head differently than the thicker (and thus heavier) blades?  It seems to me that the old RAD baits "hunted" far more erratically than either the Z-Man bait or the baits that I make.  To get one of my baits to "hunt" I really have to play with it and I am thinking that the thicker/heavier blade may play a role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The material they are made of is going to have a big effect.  A thicker aluminum blade could well be lighter than a thinner stainless steel blade.  Also I think your measurements are a bit off.

 

I'm very sure I can't stack five chatter bait blades on top of each other and have it be a 1" stack.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I was referring to the blades that are currently sold through LPO, Jann's, and Barlow's.  Those blades measure .20" on my micrometer, while the original RAD blades measure .11".  I'm no engineer or physicist, so please correct any misinterpretations.  While two identically shaped blades would likely have the same hydrodynamic effect on the bait, I wonder if the thinner (and therefore lighter) blades balance with the head differently than the thicker (and thus heavier) blades?  It seems to me that the old RAD baits "hunted" far more erratically than either the Z-Man bait or the baits that I make.  To get one of my baits to "hunt" I really have to play with it and I am thinking that the thicker/heavier blade may play a role.

Jeff,

   I have played around quite a bit with the coffin blade back when the chatterbaits came out. I made thicker ones and thinner ones, and this is what I found. The thicker ones ran deeper and seemed to have more drag. Also the thicker blades could not be bent as easy, to make them run shallower, and also you could not tune them as easily. With that said, I am going to do some testing when I get done putting out some fires. I can't see why the blades cannot be made out of aluminum, so you can bend them. Also I believe your micrometer measurements read .020 for the heavier one and .011 for the lighter blades respectively.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeff,

   I have played around quite a bit with the coffin blade back when the chatterbaits came out. I made thicker ones and thinner ones, and this is what I found. The thicker ones ran deeper and seemed to have more drag. Also the thicker blades could not be bent as easy, to make them run shallower, and also you could not tune them as easily. With that said, I am going to do some testing when I get done putting out some fires. I can't see why the blades cannot be made out of aluminum, so you can bend them. Also I believe your micrometer measurements read .020 for the heavier one and .011 for the lighter blades respectively.

At one point Battlefield tried to stamp them out of aluminum but when they tested them the hole where the blade connected to the head wore out too fast so they used stainless steel.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At one point Battlefield tried to stamp them out of aluminum but when they tested them the hole where the blade connected to the head wore out too fast so they used stainless steel.

 

I had the same experience when I made some out of brass spinner bait blades.  I had to drill the hole for the attachment to the lure too far from the edge of the blade in order for it to be strong enough for the repeated side-to-side motion.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The material they are made of is going to have a big effect.  A thicker aluminum blade could well be lighter than a thinner stainless steel blade.  Also I think your measurements are a bit off.

 

I'm very sure I can't stack five chatter bait blades on top of each other and have it be a 1" stack.  

Sorry, for the typos.  That should have been .020 and .011.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeff,

   I have played around quite a bit with the coffin blade back when the chatterbaits came out. I made thicker ones and thinner ones, and this is what I found. The thicker ones ran deeper and seemed to have more drag. Also the thicker blades could not be bent as easy, to make them run shallower, and also you could not tune them as easily. With that said, I am going to do some testing when I get done putting out some fires. I can't see why the blades cannot be made out of aluminum, so you can bend them. Also I believe your micrometer measurements read .020 for the heavier one and .011 for the lighter blades respectively.

Correct, sorry for the typos.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the thicker blades better.  I put mine in a vise tip first, as far down as I want it bent, and them push them with my thumbs to bend them.

I always worried with the original chatterbait, and the first knockoffs, that the thinner blades would either bend out on their own, or just fail at the hole connection to the jig eye.  I never had it happen, but I did have one of the first bait's snap open on a nice fish.  I got it into the boat, because the wire caught in the blade hole, but I upgraded my snaps after that.

As soon as the sst blades became available I bought some, and made my own baits with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can use any jig you wish.

 

Right now it seems there's only one company stamping blades.  I have a good feeling that this is about to change.

 

Best way to assemble them is to use a flat eye hook and a single connector.  My buddy in the tackle business is going through about 400-500 baits a week and has the assembly down to a science.

 

May I ask why you think so (about to change...)?  I'm curious, I have a few of the old coffin style left, and value them as they do give off a different vibration than the rounded for sure.  I did see Phenix is now using a modified coffin which my guess is different enough to get around the patent.  They want $15 for 6 though........

Edited by rfdong
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found these blades while looking around on the 'net. Don't know anything about the company and they don't list the size, thickness, material used, etc. They are the coffin style and the price doesn't seem too bad. I'm sure you could contact them for any specifics you may have questions about.

 

Ben

 

http://straightlineinnovations.com/vibrating-jig-blades.html

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


×
×
  • Create New...
Top